![]() ![]() QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) AND SOFTWARE TESTING? – WHY DO WE NEED THEM? ‘To err is human’ but we say ‘To rectify/prevent is Testing/QA’. Likewise in software programming, the number of errors that could occur for every KLoC (1000 lines of code) is more thus making the product defective and useless.īut we hate to incur expenses due to the occurrence of these errors. Errors may occur in our thoughts, actions and also in the products we make. Software Testing and Quality Assurance can help you ensure your software or application is 99.9% bug-free.Įrrors became a part of our daily lives. Whole brain fiber-tractography from 26 sparsely-sampled DWIs (left), the results from fully-sampled DWIs (center), and results from our framework (right).Is it really important to get services like Software Testing and Quality Assurance in the software industry?ĭo you know? On average, about 15-50 errors occur per 1000 lines of code. Under fully synthetic settings (0 DWIs), our result displays improved fidelity compared to direct B0, T2, T1 to scalar translation. As the number of DWIs decreases, model-fitting results show strong quality degradation and qDL-2D produces inaccurate structural details (see yellow insets), whereas our method preserves microstructure with high fidelity (see external capsule/red arrows). NODDI (ODI) and DKI (RK) scalar maps are estimated by different methods from arbitrarily downsampled DWIs. Quantitative microstructural estimation quality under varying DWI acquisition budgets as measured by SSIM (higher is better). ![]() visualizes a test slice where artifacts (red arrows) appear in the reference DWI, which are corrected by the generated DWIs from our methods. shows translation results with a standard DWI slice in the test set as the reference II. All potential input channels (B0, T1, T2) are visualized on the left. Synthesized DWI images (right) compared to reference image (middle) for different gradient vectors in q-space.ĭWI synthesis results under various model configurations: A uses B0 as model input constrained by L1 loss only B, C, D include additive adversarial components on top of A, while C and D take additional T2/T1 image as model input. Merged with arbitrarily downsampled DWIs, various microstructural indices can be calculated with diffusion model fitting. Qspace quality testing generator#Once trained, the generator is able to synthesize DWIs along gradients in q-space (blue dots). Our q-space conditioned translation framework. Across several recent methodologies, the proposed approach yields improved DWI synthesis accuracy and fidelity with enhanced downstream utility as quantified by the accuracy of scalar microstructure indices estimated from the synthesized images. Moreover, this approach enables the downstream estimation of high-quality microstructural maps from arbitrarily subsampled DWIs, which may be particularly important in cases with sparsely sampled DWIs. Our translation network linearly modulates its internal representations conditioned on continuous Q-space information, removing the need for fixed sampling schemes. ![]() We propose a generative adversarial translation framework for high-quality DW image estimation with arbitrary Q-space sampling given commonly acquired structural images. Further, such approaches restrict direct downstream estimations, such as tractography, from arbitrarily sampled DWIs unless we use model fitting methods spherical harmonics, for example. However, they implicitly make unrealistic assumptions of static Q-space sampling during reconstruction. Recent deep learning approaches for Diffusion MRI modeling circumvent the requirement of densely-sampled diffusion-weighted images (DWIs) by directly predicting microstructural indices from sparsely-sampled DWIs supervised with fully-sampled DWIs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |